Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6156) to renew the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve demonstration projects designed to test innovative strategies in State child welfare programs, as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
Section 1130 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a-9) is amended-- (1) in subsection (a)-- (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``1998 through 2003'' and inserting ``2011 through 2016''; (B) in paragraph (3)-- (i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or kinship guardianship'' after ``placements''; (ii) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``address kinship care'' and inserting ``provide early intervention and crisis intervention services that safely reduce out-of-home placements and improve child outcomes''; and (iii) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D) and inserting after subparagraph (B) the following: ``(C) If an appropriate application therefor is submitted, the Secretary shall consider authorizing a demonstration project which is designed to identify and address domestic violence that endangers children and results in the placement of children in foster care.''; (C) in paragraph (4), by inserting ``or kinship guardianship'' after ``assistance''; and (D) in paragraph (5), by inserting ``and the ability of the State to implement a corrective action approved under section 1123A'' before the period; (2) in subsection (e)-- (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (6); (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) and inserting ``; and''; and (C) by adding at the end the following: ``(8) an accounting of any additional Federal, State, local, and private investments (other than those with respect to which matching funds were provided under part B or E of title IV) made, during the 2 fiscal years preceding the application to provide the services described in paragraph (1), and an assurance that the State will provide an accounting of that same spending for each year of an approved demonstration project.''; (3) in subsection (f)(1)-- (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``; and'' and inserting ``, including all children and families under the project who come to the attention of the State's child welfare program, either through a report of abuse or neglect or through the provision of services described in subsection (e)(1) to the child or family;''; and (B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D) and inserting after subparagraph (B) the following: ``(C) a comparison of the amounts of Federal, State, local and private investments in the services described in subsection (e)(1), by service type, with the amount of the investments during the period of the demonstration project; and''; and (4) by adding at the end the following: ``(h) Indian Tribes Considered States.--An Indian tribe (as defined in section 479B(a)) shall be considered a State for purposes of this section.''.
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such
Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from Washington (Mr. McDermott) and the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Linder) each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Washington.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material on H.R. 6156.
Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Washington?
There was no objection.
I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, the legislation before us today will help States test innovative approaches for improving outcomes for vulnerable children who come to the attention of our child welfare system.
The bill restores the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to permit up to 10 demonstration projects annually to allow States and tribes to test efforts to improve child welfare policy. The legislation is cost neutral, and it provides the renewed waiver authority for the next 5 years.
To both increase our understanding of waiver policies and to ensure improved accountability, the legislation newly requires States to report the various sources of Federal, State, local, and private funds that are used in providing specific services under a demonstration project.
Finally, the bill adds a new Federal emphasis on supporting child welfare waivers that identify and address problems related to domestic violence that lead to children being placed in foster care and for waivers that provide early intervention and crisis intervention services that safely reduce out-of-home placements.
Past experience has taught us that child welfare waivers can help States improve outcomes for children while also informing child welfare policy at the national level. Twenty-three States received one or more waivers under the previous demonstration authority, which began in fiscal year 1996 and ended in March of 2006. Although the authority has expired, a handful of States continue to have demonstration projects in operation today.
One of the most successful strategies tested through the prior waiver authority was providing assistance to grandparents and other relatives who assume legal custody of children in foster care. Through the use of kinship care and guardianship assistance arrangements, children were able to find safe and loving homes with family members. This strategy proved to be successful in improving the outcomes of foster children, and it became Federal policy when it was incorporated into the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act, which was signed into law 2 years ago.
While providing waivers can be a useful tool in improving child welfare policy, we ultimately need more comprehensive changes to fully reform the system:
Waivers cannot correct certain basic flaws within our current method of financing child welfare programs, starting with the fact that increasing numbers of children are not eligible for Federal foster care assistance because of badly outdated eligibility criteria;
We also need systemic reforms which place a much greater emphasis on preventing abuse and neglect from occurring in the first place. I intend to continue to work towards broader reform to address these and other challenges facing programs serving children at risk of maltreatment.
Before I close, I want to quickly note that this bill continues a proud tradition of the Ways and Means Committee and of the Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support of reporting out bipartisan legislation to improve our child welfare system.
During the last Congress, I worked with Representative Jerry Weller of Illinois to enact the Fostering Connections Act, which made a series of important changes to Federal policy related to children in foster care. It passed here by unanimous consent.
Today, I am joined by the ranking member of the subcommittee, Representative John Linder, in bringing this legislation to the floor; and I expect that it will also pass by unanimous consent. It has been a great pleasure to work with John.
I know you are retiring, and I am going to have to work with a new subcommittee chairman one way or another, or with a ranking member.
So I am looking forward to continuing this tradition of dealing with the problems of children who need somebody to look out for them, and it should be a bipartisan issue every time.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, thank you for your kind remarks.
I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, this bill comes to the floor in a fashion too many bills have not in this Congress:
First, we held a subcommittee hearing. Then the legislation was drafted with bipartisan support. Finally, we ensured that it does not increase the deficit by a penny. It is an example of what can happen if we pursue goals that are widely shared and that have been demonstrated to achieve results.
The legislation before us would allow all States to follow the successful child welfare reform model tested in Florida and other places. As we learned in our hearing, those reforms reduced the number of Florida children in foster care by 36 percent. It increased adoptions by 12,000, and it improved child safety, all without spending more taxpayer money.
I would like to insert into the Record a letter of support for this legislation from Youth Villages, which has worked with local officials to achieve such successes in Florida.
Since 1994, 22 States have joined Florida in using child welfare waivers. This legislation extends the authority for all States to do so for 5 years. This will allow other States to test and replicate policies that are working. It is my hope that this one day will pave the way for successful Federal reforms covering all States.
While it appears to be good policy to allow States to waive Federal rules, perhaps future Congresses will find it equally propitious to abolish them. Meanwhile, let's move this bill forward and continue our efforts to improve the lives of all children.
Dear Chairman McDermott and Ranking Member Linder. On behalf of Youth Villages, I am writing in support of your bill, H.R. 6156. This legislation provides critical authority for the Department of Health and Human Services to extend the Title IV-E waiver program, which has demonstrated substantial impact since creation in 1994. These waivers provide states with greater flexibility in the use of Federal funds for alternative services and supports that promote safety, permanency and well-being for children in the child protection and foster care system. Youth Villages is a leader in innovative and effective services for troubled youth and their families. Since 2008, Youth Villages has had the opportunity to work collaboratively with several local, privatized child welfare organizations, known as Community Based Care agencies in implementing Florida's Title IV-E waiver. Youth Villages has three offices in Florida and is working with local entities to implement our intensive in-home Intercept services, identify and serve underserved or `stuck' populations, and provide them with outcome data to support the impact of their waiver effort. As a result of the flexibility afforded by the Title IV-E waiver, intensive reunification and targeted prevention services are given greater focus in the state's child welfare service approach. Without the award of the waiver, it would have been difficult for Youth Villages to expand its Intercept program into the state to serve the child welfare population. In the two years that Youth Villages has been operating in Florida, we have served over 225 children and families across the Central and Southern regions of the state. Over 77% at six months post-discharge are still living at home or in a home-like environment. The savings associated with serving these 225 children through Intercept instead of congregate, out-of-home placements amounts to roughly $19 million dollars when considering recidivism rates associated with both Intercept and non-Intercept placements. Youth Villages pledges its full support of H.R. 6156, as this legislation has the ability to transform the child welfare system from one that incentivizes out-of-home placement to a system that promotes in-home treatment and family unification. Regards, Patrick Lawler, CEO, Youth Villages.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to enter into the Record letters of support for H.R. 6156 that I received from the National Conference of State Legislatures and from the American Public Human Services Association. National Conference
Dear Speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader Boehner: On behalf of the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), we urge you to support H.R. 6156, a bill to renew the authority of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to approve demonstration projects designed to test innovative strategies in state child welfare programs. Congressman McDermott and Congressman Linder have fashioned bipartisan legislation that helps create opportunities to enhance the state/federal partnership to assist our nation's most vulnerable children. NCSL supports reinstating and expanding federal waiver authority so that states can test the results of increased funding flexibility on the development of service alternatives and on the overall delivery of child welfare services, targeting programs to address the needs of their children. By renewing Title VI-E waiver authority from 2011 through 2016, H.R. 6156 will give states an enhanced ability to provide early intervention and crisis intervention services that will safely reduce out-of-home placements and improve child outcomes. H.R. 6156 will allow states to improve the quality of their child welfare interventions and reinvest savings in their programs. It will also provide both state and federal legislators more information on what innovations are effective to transform the lives of children who are at risk of abuse and neglect. We applaud Congressmen McDermott and Linder for crafting this legislation. Sincerely, Representative Mary Jane Wallner, New Hampshire House of Representatives, Chair, NCSL Standing Committee on Human Services and Welfare. Representative Wes Keller, Alaska House of Representatives, Chair, NCSL Standing Committee on Human Services and Welfare.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time and urge a ``yes'' vote.
The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Washington (Mr. McDermott) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 6156, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
- May 31, 2011
- May 17, 2011
Legislation To Restore The Authority For Hhs To Grant Child Welfare Waiver Demonstration Projects To StatesSeptember 16, 2010
- September 28, 2010
- November 16, 2012
- May 31, 2011
Providing For Consideration Of H.R. 749, Passenger Rail Reform And Investment Act Of 2015, And Providing For Proceedings During The Period From March 6, 2015, Through March 13, 2015March 3, 2015
- May 31, 2011
- October 9, 2004
- June 6, 2007