| Statements On Introduced Bills And Joint Resolutions |
October 31, 2005 |
|
Orrin Hatch, R-UT
|
|
"SA 2345. Mr. MARTINEZ submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 1042, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table. SA 2346. Mr. INOUYE submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 1932, to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95); which was ordered to lie on the table."
|
|
| Privileges Of The House—Integrity Of Proceedings Of The House |
May 3, 2005 |
|
F. Sensenbrenner, R-WI
|
|
"The committee report does accurately state that sexual predators are not carved out of the exemptions that were proposed. It is not a misrepresentation. It accurately shows that the authors of the amendment did not draft those amendments as narrowly as they should have. And when we vote on legislation, we vote on what is on the plain text of the piece of paper, not on what the author of an amendment intended to do."
|
|
| National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2005—Continued |
June 23, 2004 |
|
Judd Gregg, R-NH
|
|
"Mr. President, Senator Feingold has offered an amendment intended to help military families who have a family member activated in support of a contingency operation. First of all, I make it clear that all of us want to assist families placed in the difficult position of operating with one family member called to duty."
|
|
| Amending Higher Education Act Of 1965 With Respect To Qualifications Of Foreign Schools |
September 30, 2003 |
|
John Boehner, R-OH
|
|
"When drafting the legislation in 1998, an amendment intended to extend eligibility to a for-profit veterinary school inadvertently removed the eligibility of not-for-profit and public foreign veterinary schools from participation in the Title IV Federal Family Education Loan Program. S. 570 corrects the problem by clarifying that the in-State clinical training requirement, intended only for for-profit institutions, does not apply to not-for-profit or public foreign institutions. These institutions still must meet all other statutory and regulatory requirements to be eligible for participation. S. 570 simply makes clear that not-for-profit and public foreign veterinary institutions need not have their approved clinical training take place in the United States."
|
|
| Submitted Resolutions |
September 22, 2003 |
|
Ron Wyden, D-OR
|
|
"SA 1740. Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. Dorgan, and Mr. Reid) proposed an amendment to the bill H.R. 2691, making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. SA 1741. Mr. BINGAMAN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2691, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table. SA 1742. Mr. LEAHY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2691, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table. SA 1743. Mr. LEAHY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2691, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table. SA 1744. Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. DeWine) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2691, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table. SA 1745. Mr. VOINOVICH submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2691, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table. SA 1746. Mr. VOINOVICH submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2691, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table. SA 1747. Mr. VOINOVICH submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2691, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table. SA 1748. Mr. BINGAMAN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2691, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table."
|
|