Capitol Words a project of the Sunlight Foundation

  • and

702

Compare 702

Occurrences over time

embed
  • Embed Dark
  • Embed Light
  1. '96
  2. '98
  3. '00
  4. '02
  5. '04
  6. '06
  7. '08
  8. '10
  9. '12
  10. '14
  11. '16

Mentioned most often by

Occurrences in the Congressional Record

Entry Title Date
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Section 702 And Spying By Nsa February 11, 2016
Ted Poe, R-TX
"Mr. Speaker, the NSA is using a loophole in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to spy on Americans without a warrant. Under section 702 of FISA, government agents may seize information from databases on suspected foreign terrorists."
Supporting Transparent Regulatory And Environmental Actions In Mining Act January 12, 2016
Frank Pallone, D-NJ
"Section 702 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1291) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsection (d) and (e), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following: “(c) Compliance With Other Federal Laws.—Nothing in this Act authorizes the Secretary to take any action by rule, regulation, notice, policy, guidance, or order that duplicates, implements, interprets, enforces, or determines any action taken under an Act referred to in subsection (a) or any regulation or rule promulgated thereunder.”."
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 December 18, 2015
Sherrod Brown, D-OH
"Madam President, today I wish to discuss section 702 in division O of the Omnibus appropriations bill. It is a provision that would prohibit the Treasury Department from selling, transferring or otherwise disposing of the senior preferred shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for 2 years."
Personal Explanation December 18, 2015
Ted Deutch, D-FL
"On Roll Call 702, I would have voted no. (H. Res. 566)"
The Journal December 17, 2015
Henry Cuellar, D-TX
"If I had been present, I would have voted: “yea,” on rollcall 701, on ordering the previous question on the Rule; “no,” on rollcall 702, on agreeing to H. Res. 566—Rule providing for consideration of Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment to H.R. 2029 with House Amendment #1—Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 and Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment to H.R. 2029 with House Amendment #2—“Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015”; “yea,” on rollcall 703, on Concuring in the Senate Amendment to H.R. 2029 with House Amendment #2—“Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015”; “yea,” on rollcall 704, on approving the Journal."

Popularity by state

Popularity by party